In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
One of the main tasks for humans throughout their lifespan has been to cultivate herbs in order to eat them. Although methods of agriculture have been enhanced particularly after industrial revolution, there are still some individuals across the world who have been suffering from poverty and undernourishment. This issue has had several causes which will be clarified later as well as possible solution to be taken.
To commence with, some considerable reasons should be regarded for existing starved individuals despite the improvements of farming. One of the main one is unfair distribution of fertilize soil and appropriate climate for agriculture. Take, Saudi Arabia and Italy, as examples, to compare two various countries in climate and raining which because of dryness of the first region, government should get over many difficulties to provide enough food sources for their residents. Another factor has been shortage of not only facilities, but also workforces because of their bad economic condition. Therefore, they may have more possibilities not to able to provide nourishments for their citizens regarding to those troubles.
In addition, there have been considerable solution which should be taken in order to tackle this significant issue. The main one has been for developed countries which have developed equipment as well as hardworking employees. These societies could make efforts to carry out necessary measures in order to implement good agriculture techniques in undeveloped ones. For instance, countries such as United States could send some of their workers and moreover several facilities to improve countries which are suffered from poor economy and cannot cultivate enough food for their citizens such as Africa.
In conclusion, according to advanced amenities in agriculture portion all around the world, some societies because of their bad economy which has propelled them not to be able to afford to farm. Also, developed countries can make lots of difference by applying essential arrangements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...al causes which will be clarified later as well as possible solution to be taken. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54340836013 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95499616874 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575562700965 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6562160854 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0992737073936 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365991416042 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439894058394 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745676381865 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434833413242 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.