the graphs below show the types of music purchased in Britain according to sex and age.
The graphs illustrate people performances through buying three types of music including Pop, Rock and Classic. In addition, people are categorized by age and sex factors.
According to the graphs, while 25-34-year-old people are the most important advocators of Pop and Rock music, the aged prefer to listen to the classical one. However, Pop and Rock music are teenagers and 35-44-year-old people favorite and Classical music is less popular for them, As a matter of fact less than 5% of these groups buy such music. Interestingly, youngsters, who are 25-34, purchase all kind of music, but all the same, they are interested in Pop and Rock twice as much as Classical type.
In terms of gender, men like music more than women. Nevertheless, while almost 25% of men prefer to listen to the Rock and Pop, 15% of women like to listen to those. Surprisingly, both groups are not interested in Classical type and only less than10%of males and females purchase that.
In sum, based on graphs data, different genders of people like to listen to various types of music in their different chapters of life. 25-35-year-old people consist almost 30% of Pop and Rock music customers and the aged are the important clients of Classical music, which is disfavored by two groups of 16-24 and 35-44. Additionally, men are more interested in music than women. However, both groups would rather Pop and Rock than Classical type
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 373, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... such music. Interestingly, youngsters, who are 25-34, purchase all kind of music, but ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, while, in addition, kind of, all the same, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96624472574 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75066006331 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493670886076 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2887113614 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0833333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218538606528 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948140775022 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427556243077 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155610198833 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478964726165 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.