In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
There are many people who do not have enough food to eat in the world, although agriculture is developing as well as possible. This essay will discuss the rationable behind this phenomenon, and then offer some feasible solutions to it.
There are number of factors reponsible for many people are facing hunger. Chief among these is that population over the world is increasing significantly. In other word, a demand for food becomes more and more greater in number. This leads to the fact that food can not be enough to satisfy all the demand, especially nutrious and healthy food that provides energy for people. Thousand of people, as a consequence, have died because of hunger. Another reason worth mentioning is climate change. The weather are becomeing more extreme; therefore, this can pose threat to food production process. This mean that people might be not supplied enough food to eat and maintain their energy. As a result, they still go hungry although there have the advances made in farming.
Various measures, nevertheless, can be adopted to tackle the situation. To begin with, the government can introduce punishments of people who do activities harmfully affecting the environment. This can results in the clean and healthy environment; therefore, we have a good conditions to develop farming. The second approach could be encouraging families to apply famlily planning. As a consequence, population are stability, which makes easier to control and supply people with food, job and other nescesseries.
In conclusion, although the fact that many people still face hunger can stem from many causes, steps can be taken to alleviate the situation.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantage 56
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting an reporting the main features and make comparisons where ralevant 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'greater' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: greater
...ord, a demand for food becomes more and more greater in number. This leads to the fact that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: greater
...a demand for food becomes more and more greater in number. This leads to the fact that food can n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 377, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a Thousand'.
Suggestion: A Thousand
...y food that provides energy for people. Thousand of people, as a consequence, have died ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...lly affecting the environment. This can results in the clean and healthy environment; t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, second, so, still, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21641791045 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79118444858 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578358208955 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.867208595 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.2352941176 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285586140274 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827975432093 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597792356111 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176355784145 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278694692988 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.