In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this a case? What can be done about this problem?
It is obvious that we are entering the time of progressive technology with countless positive effects on the environment, health, and so on, whereas there is still a distressing problem linking to famine in various places in the world, especially in Africa. From my perspective, this essay will illustrate some possible reasons and how to solve them the most effectively.
The predominant factor leading to this is the inflation and ignorance of the governments. In other words, everything from clothes to food is extremely priced unaffordable that is not easy for a family to earn their incomes and spend much of them on food. Additionally, the authorities do not care about the status of the famine in their nation no matter how exhausted their residents are. More specifically, according to a survey posted in the Times newspaper, over half of the Indian population are struggling with their empty stomachs and waiting for an aid that never comes.
Despite that situation, there are numerous potential solutions discovered to minimalizing this issue. Firstly, the authorities had better put a check on the food price more regularly than before whilst any basic eatable product is not allowed to sell more than the MRT. It is understandable to sell bread in no more than ten portions due to its fundamental necessity, as an instance. Furthermore, the governments' philanthropists ought to purchase enough food as well as personal living items for people who need help from them. Consequently, no one has to go to bed with an empty stomach and these steps are able to reduce the number of starving people.
In conclusion, the primary cause of this worrying issue is the price rise and governments' apathy. However, with the authorities' assistance or volunteer organization, this problem will be improved overwhelmingly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authorities'' or 'authority's'?
Suggestion: authorities'; authority's
...d governments apathy. However, with the authorities assistance or volunteer organization, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, whereas, as to, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18243243243 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05832635879 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4771066702 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121206165743 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443822612044 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412841354901 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810778483731 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439726777509 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.