The revolutionary advancements in field of agriculture endowed mankind with substantial resources for their survival in best possible way. Modern world produces more food than it needs; however, there are sections in societies that could not afford this basic necessity. Favoring free markets and competitive environment, modern societies resulted in unequal distribution of wealth among members of societies. Provided the financial assistance to agriculture research and poor members, governments can overcome this problem.
Having encouraged by free market, many agriculture firms used to produce food items according to their demand and profit. For instance, many multinational agriculture firms in undeveloped African countries produce coffee to export it to international markets. Producing less locally demanded food items, these countries import food items from others countries. As result of less availability and more demand, these food items sometimes becomes out of reach. Extreme weather conditions also affect the agricultural production. Recently, many farmers in India were unable to make living on agriculture because of less production due to extreme hot weather.
Only if governments provide financial assistance to agricultural research and needy ones, can government solve the hunger’s problem. Climate change affected the productions of edibles in many parts of the world. Assisting financially the agriculture research to produce the crops having tendency to resist harsh weather and conditions, governments can control to improve and provide for growing populations. Subsiding the food and providing economic support for lower section of societies, governments can eliminate the food insecurity.
In conclusion, agriculture developments enabled modern civilization to produce in abundance yet there are people who can afford to eat. Not only the governments should support the research in modern agriculture techniques, but also they need to provide financial support to poor sections of societies ensuring food security.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...ubstantial resources for their survival in best possible way. Modern world produces mor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0409556314 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0646867856 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587030716724 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3698716981 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0930297487332 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367311633403 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383076077838 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631444482911 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366319825523 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.