Studies suggest that children spend more time on watching TV than they do in the past and spend less on doing active and creative things. Why do you think this is case ? What measurement and methods can be used to tackle with it ?
It is true that these days youngsters are watching television more than they used to and often try to avoid doing tasks which need creativity. There are many reasons for this, but this situation should be addressed by encouraging kids in some practical ways
There are two main reasons why fewer children prefer doing active and creative things. One reason is that the Internet has discouraged them from thinking by themselves. With a few clicks, everyone can get access to the huge knowledge of human beings as well as the answer to any problems they are facing up to. Furthermore, the teaching method used at schools is a cause of children's lack of creativity. In Vietnam, for example, school children just have to listen to what their teachers say and write everything that are written on the board without having a few minutes to think what they are being taught. It dissuades children from enhancing the ability of developing their own ideas.
The school and individual family should take some steps to tackle this issue effectively. Firstly, parents ought to encourage their kids to stop sitting aimlessly in front of their TV and start exploring and asking why questions about the world around them by limiting the amount of time they can use television. The more time they spend on outdoor activities, the more energetic they will be. Secondly, educational institutions should organise more competitions for their pupils to take part in. Participating in contests helps children develop hands-on skills such as teamwork, communication as well as creative thinking which is necessary for a well-rounded growth.
In conclusion, there are some known reasons for this trend. However, something should be done by the institution and family to deter school children from spending too much time watching tv instead of stimulating their innovation by doing active things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-01 | conan21390 | 89 | view |
- Celebrities are usually famous for glamour and wealth rather than their achievements.Some say taking them as an example can be dangerous for young people.To what extent you agree or disagree. 73
- Studies suggest that children spend more time on watching TV than they do in the past and spend less on doing active and creative things. Why do you think this is case ? What measurement and methods can be used to tackle with it ? 89
- Some people think that all parents should take childcare training courses. Do you agree or disagree ? 73
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 84
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and televisions in order to decrease the level of violent crimes in the society. Do you agree or disagree ? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... encouraging kids in some practical ways There are two main reasons why fewer chi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14052287582 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71249901447 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604575163399 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7663404001 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.357142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349287930826 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102058944054 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753788047463 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207382472806 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229714008718 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.