Nowadays, the concept of online communication has become prevalent among teenagers according to some studies. This essay will suggest the underlying reasons behind this phenomenon, and propose possible measures to alter the situation.
There are some reasons why juveniles opt to socialise online rather than meet physically. Firstly, with the advent of technology, the number of young people using personal electronic devices and Internet has increased. Those youngsters are, as a result, so engrossed with this that they became attached to their phones, and are hardly aware of their physical surroudings and people. For example, the reports of a recent survey conducted in the US suggests that more than 80% of the American adolescents prefer online communication due to the fact that they own personal digital appliances such as phones, laptops and Ipods which facilitate easy socialising. Furthermore, the prevalence of numerous social networking platforms can also serve as a root cause for the condition. For instance, there a number of applications like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter through which youngsters can make both phone and video calls, send messages and share their pictures.
Certain steps can be taken in order to tackle this global issue. First and foremost, parents should curb the amount of time their offspring spend on the phone. By doing this, they not only make the child get out of the unreal world, but also spend quality time together with the family. Additionally, governments and various organizations could devise campaigns to raise the awareness about the negative empacts of the social interaction on adolescents. In this way, children could be encouraged to partake in physical meetings with family, friends and relatives instead of chatting online.
In conclusion, it is true that teenagers are in favour of online socialising than the offline one because of the availability of electronic gadgets and social media sites. However, if parents and policy-makers contribute to the change in their preferences from digital to real communication, teenager will spend more time meeting others in person.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46385542169 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85770205319 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629518072289 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8309555735 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.933333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27296923671 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788044782974 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580910651841 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160161600116 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523394422492 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.