The given chart illustrates the percentage of residents of five Australian cities (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart) who bought fresh or instant coffee or went to a café for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks.
Overall, the percentage of those who visited a café for coffee or tea was higher than the cities with other coffee-related habits in almost all cities except for Adelaide, where this was exceeded by the figures for the residents who purchased instant coffee.
In terms of the proportion of people going to a café for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks, Melbourne and Hobart had nearly equal outcomes at around 63% while in Sydney, it accounted for approximately 61%. The level in Brisbane comprised 55% of these people; in Adelaide, however, the percentage was slightly lower than that of those who bought instant coffee (nearly 49% and 50% respectively).
There was a small difference between the percentages of people buying fresh and instant coffee in Sydney and Melbourne ranging between around 42% and about 48%. On the other hand, Brisbane and Hobart experienced the significant disparities in this regard, with the former having almost 34% and approximately 52% and the latter having around 37% and nearly 55%, respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08252427184 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76999070844 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52427184466 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.4343555871 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.5 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.3333333333 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142653277461 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759153581053 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542932252043 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098492202785 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409043660805 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.2329268293 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.