The technology is developing rapidly these days. This development is said to result in the extinction of traditional cultures, and therefore, they cannot co exist together. This essay will argue that cultures will not lose their total values despite the advancement in technology.
The notion of disappearance of cultures proves to be true due to the technological progress, according to some people. This is because the communiation through cutting-edge mobile phones and internet is replacing the traditional family gatherings. For instance, a recent survey conducted in the USA reveals that more than 30% of young people prefer spending holidays and celebrations with their partners, leaving only the text messages for their parents and family members. However, these new devices are not likely to deprive the communities of their fundamental cultural heritage.
Nevertheless, it is wrong to say that the traditional cultures will be lost completely. In other words, there are many societies and groups of people who admire and follow cultural rituals even though they are equipped with highly developed technologies. For example, India is considered to be one of the fastest technologically developing countries in the world involving numerous experts in the fields of engineering and IT, but irrespective of this trend, the Indians are also regarded as the most traditional and cultural individuals on Earth. This phenomenon is not only widespread among the elderly, but also among the youngsters residing in or out of this country. Thus, as long as the members of particular cultural are adherent to their traditions, no technology can make such traditions disappear entirely .
In conclusion, it is ineluctable that improved technology affects the traditional cultures. Although there are certain cases in which the prevalence of technology is detrimental to cultural heritage, I do believe that their impact is not of paramount importance, and cultures will still continue to thrive. In short, it is totally possible for technology and traditions to exist simultaneously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 816, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... make such traditions disappear entirely . In conclusion, it is ineluctable tha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14144267963 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58934169279 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2164102908 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.933333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42030199111 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141012957916 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683745468965 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261471332855 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724610003126 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.