The pie chart illustrates the destination of Anthropology graduates (from one university) upon their graduation while the table gives information about the remuneration of these graduates after 5 years’ work.
Overall, it is apparent that more than half of the graduates chose the full-time work after finishing their undergraduate degree course. Additionally, the percentage of those who were employed in government sectors was higher regarding the highest salaries than those working in other sectors.
The full-time work was opted by 52% of anthropology graduates, which was the highest proportion among all the preferences. The figure for those who did part-time job or were unemployed comprised slightly more than one tenth, at 15% and 12% respectively. The same percentage of graduates contributed to full time study and an unknown source, at 8%. Ultimately, only insignificant proportion of students continued both to study and work(part-time) simultaneously.
Regarding the salaries, 5% and 15% of freelance consultants and government sector employees received $25000-49999 and %50000-74999 respectively, whereas the percentages of those employed in private companies were almost double, at 10% and 35% respectively. The group of workers with earnings ranging $75000 -99999 consisted of 40% f freelance consultants, 30% of government sector workers and the quarter of private companies’ employees. The percentages of all of these working having wages above $100000 ranged between 30% and 40%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...one tenth, at 15% and 12% respectively. The same percentage of graduates contribute...
^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... percentage of graduates contributed to full time study and an unknown source, at 8%. Ult...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75675675676 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26645845403 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626126126126 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.595967578 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205343985107 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800459825301 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114465896587 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152931982719 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133990584571 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.