The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years.
The given graphs detail the surveyed information regarding future opportunities availed by Anthropology graduates from any given university. The pie chart represents the work status and further study aspirations, while salary proportion based on types of employment over a period of 5 years is detailed in the table.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that more than half of the graduates were offered full-time work as against part-time workers, higher study aspirers, and unemployed. In addition, the majority of government employers were making the highest salary within a given period.
According to the given illustration, 52% of the graduates were appointed in full-time jobs. Although 8% of the students opted for a full-time higher study, nearly 5% preferred both part-time jobs along with higher studies. Just 15% of the pupils destined to be part-time workers. Despite 80% of graduates who got well-settled, unemployed and unknowns comprised 12% and 8% respectively.
With regard to the salary table, in a 5 years' window, government workers led the distribution, as 50% made up more than $100,000 as opposed to 40% and 30% freelancers and private workers respectively. Although a similar trend of 5% and 15% were shown by freelancers and government employees in the slab below $75,000, private workers surpassed by 5% to 20%. Also, all the three employment accounted for 40%,30%, and 25% respectively between $75,000 to $99,999.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owns comprised 12% and 8% respectively. With regard to the salary table, in a 5 ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, regarding, so, well, while, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42358078603 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04432276045 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61135371179 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4617719362 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.909090909 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.09688233637 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356632748632 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305678000571 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627423261394 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389169547413 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.