These days, there are certain disputes regarding the advantages of outdoor activities and computer games for children. Some individuals perceive former to have more positive effects on youth than the latter. This essay will argue that the activities held by children in the fresh air are superior to playing computer games despite the latter having some benefits too.
Computer games have recently become so prevalent that many youngsters are engrossed with them. Although, generally, being detrimental, they have an obvious advantage. In other words, playing computer games provide children with technological skills, which are the most significant skills in the modern era. For example, according to a recent survey, more than half the children around the world, who commenced playing digital games at their early ages, are considered to be one of the prominent IT specialists or programmers. Therefore, computer games are helpful in a way that they may ensure the child to pursue an eminent career later in life.
Nevertheless, some people feel that outdoor games should be more encouraged since they play a preponderant role in youngsters' development. Firstly, because outdoor games are organized outside of the house or any building, they assist children in maintaining proper physical health. The statistical data reveals that almost 90% of children, who were engaged in playing outside, have better heart and lungs functioning than their counterparts playing indoors. Furthermore, playing in the street helps the child to improve the communication skills as he or she meets many people outside and interacts besides making some friends.
In conclusion, computer games tend to have some positive outcomes, yet the benefits of outdoor activities for children are inevitable and outweigh that of computer games. I do recommend that children should be motivated to spend their time outside rather than being attached to electronic devices.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50666666667 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76927587808 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7410619233 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360625506101 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126962519788 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698196859367 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237164267282 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419370022804 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.