It is generally accepted that cars are potentially the most handy and famous mode of transport, but it also negatively affects the environment and imperils the lives of pedestrians and motorists. Therefore, the reliance on such vehicles ought to be curbed by governments. This essay will argue that the damage the cars inflict on nature and on other individuals is inevitable despite having some benefits.
Many people find it easy to commute from one place to another by car, and it has already become an indispensable part human life. In other words, a single four-wheeler can accommodate a certain number of people depending on its size and model. Besides, the usage of cars is so widespread that it is available almost in every part of the world. For example, according to the reports of a recent survey, almost half the global population travels by car in their day-to-day lives because of the conveniences it provides.
Nonetheless, there are some drawbacks associated with cars, which should not be ignored. Firstly, because of the proliferation of emissions produced by these means of transport, the problem of air contamination is becoming rife. Consequently, many residents are suffering from various health related issues such as breathing problems, stress and frustration. Furthermore, careless drivers are jeopardizing lives of those crossing the roads and those riding two-wheeler vehicles. For instance, the statistical data on the frequency of cars accidents reveals that more than ten car accidents occur every day throughout the world, and the victims are usually the passengers rather than drivers. Thus, these factors that cause serious threats to human life require urgent actions to take, and the responsibilities should be taken by the federal authorities.
In conclusion, I tend to concede that cars are ubiquitous and convenient, yet I do believe that its disadvantage, which are detrimental for health, outweigh its advantages. Hence, it is best for governments to strive to reduce the prevalence of cars, and instead, encourage public to use other environmentally modes of transport.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
... proliferation of emissions produced by these means of transport, the problem of air contam...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35435435435 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08033755788 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4946514704 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.866666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5333333333 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166034150252 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449859315761 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335773966879 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934572466012 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173190657651 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.