Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon athletes’ income and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, some people believe that top-ranked sports professionals deserve to obtain much more earnings, while other individuals are of the opinion that there are more significant professions than sports champions to get a great deal of money. In my mind, providing athletes with colossal amount of money is not fair in terms of other important vocations as well as benefits for societies.
Obviously, such occupations as doctors and inventors have higher significance than sports professionals, or at least they must be placed at the equal level. For example, a heart surgeon who saves enormous humans’ life during his or her career has to be considered to advantage as extra remunerations as athletes. The same rules should be taken into account for prominent inventors and entrepreneurs.
Furthermore, are sports champions much more beneficial and useful for societies than teachers? Teachers everyday for more than 30 years, are struggling with pupils to educate and to prepare them as the society’s future generation. Hence, by how much money the society could compensate teachers’ endeavors? Undoubtedly, it was worth far more than campions’ extraordinary salaries.
On the other hand, we shouldn’t lose sight of sports champions’ fans. They maintain that athletes promote the flags of their countries, through winning competitions which are held all around the globe, and nations’ pride as well. What’s more, private clubs do thier best to recruit well-known champions due to their commercial benefits. For instance, clubs could repay expenditures and contracts’ costs by means of selling athletes’ clothes and signed photos. Meanwhiles, successful sports professionals pave the way to provide the societies population with entertainments.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support vigorously the idea that paying a great deal of money for sports professional instead of other more important jobs is downright unfair. Which one have to be paid more: a soccer player who obtain the title of the world cup or the explorer of Covid19 vaccine?
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...mple a heart surgeon who saves enormous humans life during his or her career has to be...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: teachers
...eneficial and useful for societies than teachers Teachers everyday for more than 30 years are str...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ul for societies than teachers Teachers everyday for more than 30 years are struggling w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ordinary salaries On the other hand we shouldnt lose sight of sports champions fans The...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...und the globe and nations pride as well Whats more private clubs do thier best to rec...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 516, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'societies'' or 'society's'?
Suggestion: societies'; society's
...ofessionals pave the way to provide the societies population with entertainments To sum ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, well, while, as to, at least, for example, for instance, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29325513196 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86611249563 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615835777126 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 341.0 20.2975951904 1680% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1805.0 106.682146367 1692% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 341.0 20.7667163134 1642% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 125.0 7.06120827912 1770% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254376657158 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.254376657158 0.084324248473 302% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14073438631 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104539330254 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 174.0 13.0946893788 1329% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -274.64 50.2224549098 -547% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 136.3 11.3001002004 1206% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.88 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.81 8.58950901804 289% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 138.4 10.1190380762 1368% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 59.0 10.7795591182 547% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...mple a heart surgeon who saves enormous humans life during his or her career has to be...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: teachers
...eneficial and useful for societies than teachers Teachers everyday for more than 30 years are str...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ul for societies than teachers Teachers everyday for more than 30 years are struggling w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ordinary salaries On the other hand we shouldnt lose sight of sports champions fans The...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...und the globe and nations pride as well Whats more private clubs do thier best to rec...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 516, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'societies'' or 'society's'?
Suggestion: societies'; society's
...ofessionals pave the way to provide the societies population with entertainments To sum ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, well, while, as to, at least, for example, for instance, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29325513196 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86611249563 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615835777126 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 341.0 20.2975951904 1680% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1805.0 106.682146367 1692% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 341.0 20.7667163134 1642% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 125.0 7.06120827912 1770% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254376657158 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.254376657158 0.084324248473 302% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14073438631 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104539330254 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 174.0 13.0946893788 1329% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -274.64 50.2224549098 -547% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 136.3 11.3001002004 1206% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.88 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.81 8.58950901804 289% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 138.4 10.1190380762 1368% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 59.0 10.7795591182 547% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.