Supermarkets should only sell food produced from within their own country rather than imports from overseas.
What are your opinions on this?
The social phenomenon of food consumption has been drawing public attention. The question of whether supermarket should sorely sell goods manufactured from within their country or importing food from other countries not is a controversial issue. I totally disagree with this point of view and this essay will show the following reasons.
There are several reasons to explain why food consumption in a country without importing that takes its toll on many aspects of a country. If the number of supermarkets does not have a necessary innovation about ingredients, foods and among others; all residents will become bored with full of out of dated products. This means that leading to the dire consequence which all citizens gradually steer clear of these products. Furthermore, the profit of the supermarkets would be declined considerably in the sense that the income of the staffs also could be excessively low, which throws their quality of life in disarray.
On the contrary, many hold a belief that imported food could reap an array of benefits. First and Foremost, this also presents many perfect opportunities to enhance the quality of food. To be more specific, the promotion of creativity in food could be developed strongly, which makes the competition between many supermarkets become cutthroat with the sole objective to revenue the income. As a result, many supermarkets have to update food quality and cater a lot of selections to the buyer in purchasing food. Secondly, it is when many imported foods are widespread which is the main culprit of multi-tasking the rate of unemployment for any government. The end results could support the government to lose pressure about the responsibility of the welfare state, which is stretched thin steadily when out of work is to increase from year to year.
For the reasons mentioned above, the assets of imported foods will be far more significant than employing foods self-produced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-13 | Rudraksha surve | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-09 | gladz0917 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-01 | kkcmunna | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-21 | sudheerssmg | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-28 | shiffali Garg | 73 | view |
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What causes and what are the problems 61
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...tion has been drawing public attention. The question of whether supermarket should sorely sell goods ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...f life in disarray. On the contrary, many hold a belief that imported food could reap ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2268370607 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94606458045 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581469648562 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0597849519 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257252255365 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878976812169 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935495833 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171545358074 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983223738604 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.