Task 2: Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
People have a different view about the necessity of public libraries, while other people think that libraries can be replaced by computer technology due to its functions. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because of the benefits that technology can bring to residents are much more than public libraries.
Firstly, people, who always busy on work or study and do not have enough time to go to the public libraries, can use a computer or smartphone as their little libraries with more than enough information. So, the only thing they have to do is just ask google A.I for a title of the books and download its PDF file to learn. It is a save time and help busy people to get more information all around them, moreover, people do not have to worry about the deadline to return the books.
On the one hand, computer technology also supports people to save money. People do not have to pay for the books which they want to borrow in the libraries or gas fees when they go there. In particular, they can read an E-book on their phones, I-pad or computer when they move and just have to spend a little money on the Internet data. This benefit will have the residents to save money to spend on the more necessary things
In conclusion, I believe that computer technology can replace libraries and play an important role in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...ng they have to do is just ask google A.I for a title of the books and download i...
^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey to spend on the more necessary things In conclusion, I believe that computer t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, in particular, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54771784232 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43777257876 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53112033195 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.2200736074 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.777777778 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254123391053 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114834943862 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576843057584 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176156644621 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411848757217 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 78.4519038076 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.