Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a

In recent years, people socializing with each other through social media. Some people believe that because of technology the style of individuals interacts with their friends and family members has changed and it is a negative development. This essay will discuss why technology has a positive impact on people and what are the problems of technology for relationships.

These days, people will lose their privacy due to technology. In addition, there are plenty of fake accounts on social media websites. As a result, the chances of fraud is increasingly high on social networking media. For example, some innocent people will give their personal information to fake users and sometimes non-real users also ask for money and blackmail them. Moreover, most fake accounts steal good people's identity. In short, good people think that they have genuine friends on the internet but they do not have real friends.

Although there are lots of negative aspects of the technology for socializing with each other, persons will also improve their communication skills while communicating with people who are from all around the world. Furthermore, people can also make new friends globally and enlarge their connections and it will also help in their personal growth. For instance, English is becoming popular these days so people can learn the English language while having conversations with each other on several platforms. Moreover, students will get more benefits in the future. Overall, because of improving communication skills, it is crucial to have the technology.

It is increasingly likely that technology has a lot of prons in the future to socialize with people. However, there has been required to have some privacy policies for users on social media. Ultimately, technology leads to positive aspects in many fields in the future.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in short, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34020618557 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75018880372 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5974031797 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4117647059 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283585391838 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910971229772 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763655033813 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193197483057 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987418482891 0.056905535591 174% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.