Task 2: Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages
Currently, an increasing number of people are concerned about the fact that many people choose the internet to communicate although it is an important one instead of meeting at the conference room or a hall. However, whether it has more benefits to compare with disadvantages is a debatable issue. My view is that communicate through a small screen can give people a great win-win outcome. Reasons are as follows.
First, it is obvious that having a conversation online can save people money. This means that, individuals work not only in their area but also out of town or country. However, moving always cost citizens a considerable amount of money with a lot of things from transportation to accommodation. So, it is convenient that people can meet others without moving and costing money.
Moreover, meeting or discussion which happened online can be occurred wherever and whenever. For example, I had an online English class with my teacher in America. We could talk together whenever we were free, although it was at home or in the park. I could learn a lot from her and I found it was more convenient than go to the class because the time was freedom and the place too.
That is not to say that meeting online not has disadvantages. Of course, when working online, people cannot see their coworker clearly to believe in them to cooperate with. But I think if we decided to work with somebody, we should know about that person clearly.
In conclusion, online communicating can has both of advanatages and disadvantages, however, the benefits of it are greater than
- Task 2: The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts 11
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are play in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individuals sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 56
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sadvantages, however, the benefits of it are greater than
^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er, the benefits of it are greater than
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88432835821 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84731322159 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589552238806 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5713624338 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8125 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0618836797242 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245093340471 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381038428735 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0346305695484 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205317672833 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.