It is often argued that today's youth is much more aware of problems like environment, poverty and animal welfare than past generations. I firmly agree with this statement because today's era ie technological and this is awareness among society.
On the one hand, children today are connected to world around through social networking sites. For example, Instagram is a platform where single hashtag can go viral and comes to each and every child's knowledge like metoo movement which has disclosed the brutal cases of sexual assault with both men and women. As a result, with the help of mobile phone people get to know each and every issue. Therefore, they get involved in online social campaigns to make world better place. Furthermore, nowadays unity of youth is so strong that their voices is heard by government as wel as political parties to get world out oc utter chaos. Scores of youth NGO'S are working together to resolve the issue of poverty by providing basic necessities to improvise their living standard of poverty driven society. Animals today are treated brutally and that led to extinction of rare species like white tiger etc.
On the other hand, youth of the past generations was not aware of such social evils because they were not qualified enough and didn't had knowledge of their rights for instance, today people are not afraid to raise their voice if they see something awful happening in world whether they do so anonymously or declare their identity to outer world. People have courge to speak their heart out, general public today follow rules and regulations which are imposed for safety of animals or subsidy on gas cylinders so that poor section of society may have something better to look forward to. People in past did hunting as a leisure activity. But, now society is aware of good, bad and ugly. They know the difference between 'if they do what they did they will get what they got.
In conclusion, i believe today youth is educated and technology is immensely growing that had made the world a global village now people are connected than they were in past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
It is often argued that todays youth is much more aware of problems li...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...solve the issue of poverty by providing basic necessities to improvise their living standard of p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ause they were not qualified enough and didnt had knowledge of their rights for insta...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e have courge to speak their heart out, general public today follow rules and regulations whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'hunt'
Suggestion: hunt
... to look forward to. People in past did hunting as a leisure activity. But, now society...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ll get what they got. In conclusion, i believe today youth is educated and tec...
^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...now people are connected than they were in past.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87150837989 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4072767664 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586592178771 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.7308747467 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.266666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111179592926 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406610562667 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052682770468 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780530056168 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467869448261 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.