In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
The dominance of advertising has proved its unshake impact on how both small or big companies publicize their products. With the aim to draw potential customers' attention as well as make the differences with the competitors , most of the companies highlight that their items are new-brand despite the grievous upshots.
Admittedly, businesses can set a visible insight as to how their products can be considered different from other line products from their rivals as well as humans' curiosity to new features promoted in advertisements. It is conspicuous that one certain merchandise, on the markets, can be manufactured by different companies; therefore, consumers find it arduous to recognise the differences. This leads to the fact that they seem to pick randomly without caring about brands or qualities. However, by emphasizing newly-added ingredients or producing methods, one company can be viable in setting its goods prominent and outstanding from the others. Furthermore, humans are curious living creatures who are willing to pay a huge amount of money just to experience never-trying features. Hence, the sales of that advertised product is likely to leap drastically at once it is launched. The success of Iphones- one of the most costly mobile phones- is an exemplary model for this movement. By revealing some new functions in Iphone 12, thousands of technology enthusiasts have agreed to wait in such a long queue to possess that device.
However, the aforementioned practice is not always beneficial once buyers' high expectations are not met. There is no profit nor new loyal customers if the product is exaggeratedly advertised. It is noticeable that social media is not only where people interact and unwind but also where influencers share their experience and outlook. Therefore, if a misleading advertising is unveiled by one of them, the catastrophic reputation can be swiftly spread to a multitude of internet users from far and wide. As a result, the implications of misleading and deceiving the public is the boycott, which can push the business to the verge of bankruptcy. A few years ago, the supplementary food from famous brand names was welcomed by throngs of weak-health people; however, nutritionists and the medical department soon afterwards declared that there was no quality ingredient in these products. This did trigger a strong wave of opposition from used-to-believe customers so that the manufacturer had to be out of operation.
By way of conclusion, attracting customers' curiosity and highlighting a product by promoting new features in advertising seems on no account to be a good movement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customers'' or 'customer's'?
Suggestion: customers'; customer's
...roducts. With the aim to draw potential customers attention as well as make the differenc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ake the differences with the competitors , most of the companies highlight that th...
^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om other line products from their rivals as well as humans curiosity to new featu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2227.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34052757794 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19375123188 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594724220624 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.093810577 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.722222222 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175834498405 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494887591225 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470293689285 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112344541729 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216558423019 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.