There is an increasing amount of advertising directed at children which encourages them to buy goods such as toys and snacks. Many parents are worried that these advertisements put too much pressure on children, while some advertisers claim that they provide useful information to children. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Targeted advertisement on children has become a substantial concern for parents as they opine that this cause a stress on young minds. Contrarily, it is said that commercials are a source of information. These both views will be discussed in detail in below paragraph, however, my beliefs are certainly in favor of later opinion.
On the one hand, guardians believe that children minds are corrupted by focused product publicity. This is because of the reason that puerile thinking can easily be diverted towards purchasing of products through illustrious presentation. For instance, fashionable and trendy clothes and beauty products are constantly advertised by hiring young models which are taken as inspiration by adolescence. This marketing strategy cause serious consequences such as overwhelming feeling of suppression faced by teenagers to consolidate the imaginary societal demands. Furthermore, tempting items are usually highly priced which are not affordable by many. This trend cause inferiority complex and sometimes becomes the reason behind delinquency.
On the other hand, advertisements display myriad of product options available in market which is a tremendous source of awareness. Take the example of Windows, through commercials on social media, on which major users are teenagers, provided the opportunity to experience formidable advancements in technology. This style of dissemination of cognition is highly appreciated on many forums. Additionally, without these promotions, no one would have knowledge of items and the options available in different aspects such as price and quality.
In conclusion, although advertisement relating children products can cause problems such as mental stress, but are certainly eclipsed by the benefits achieved in the form of awareness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82641509434 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17086685031 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62641509434 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4812644115 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164765657898 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507536797979 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517052162792 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106751681509 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229644639046 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.