In these recent decades, people who are in various generations work together in the same workplace and it is extremely normal. However, it has both pros and cons. They have different thoughts and mindsets. In contrast, they can help each other to improve at their workplace. From my point of view, they should work together and they must have positive attitude for their companies. In this essay, the aforementioned will be discussed.
It is certainly obvious that people in different generations have various dreams and sometimes they are not able to comprehend each other. It can lead to creating many problems at work. For instance, the youth want to learn more and achieve their goals or chase their dreams as soon as possible and they are extremely active in their workplace although, the middle age employees tend to be a manager and they do not want to learn more or sometimes they don not have a tendency to work unconsciously. In this condition, young people believe that the old ones cannot work and the elderly do not allow the young to improve simultaneously. Therefore, it leads to several problems for both categories.
Another issue is that both generations can help each other. Definitely the elderly has a wide range of experiences and they are normally expert in their area of expertise and also they are able to teach their knowledge to the youth. Furthermore, the young people can respect them and realize that they are precious for their organization and also use their knowledge or help them to work with cutting-edge technology. Hence, both categories can work in the same room.
All in all, in spite of the fact that both groups have different targets and thinking, they can improve the level of the organizations. In addition, both generations can learn several things from each other. Personally, I have been learning several issues from my colleagues who are older than me and I am grateful that I have been getting to know these people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91017964072 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71760646871 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476047904192 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4868194943 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124745677655 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478628159664 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381406505255 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09000218023 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371155714464 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.