Over decades, nuclear power witnessed boom in modern history. Nuclear energy is used to retain world peace as well as affordable and ecologically friendly source of energy. As far some people argue that atomic technology brings uncountable advantages, I absolutely disagree with them. This essay will support my opinion. The essay will firstly outline how enormous negative impact can have simple human error or climate changes, secondly, how blind are scientist and society about future handling with the waste from nuclear production.
Modern society have witnessed in recent history many fatalities caused by a human or weather. As far as nuclear plants are constructed with advanced technology, human-being still can not control weather changes and its impact. The prime example is Japan, where in 2000 earthquake followed by massive tsunami destroyed huge nuclear power station. Spread of radioactive substances used for production caused lost of many lives as well as made the area non-liveable for next 2000 years. Furthermore, using developed IT technology does not guarantee that human error is not possible. For instance, in 1986, in Ukraine, simple human error when operational technician disregarded overheating in cooling chamber caused enormous explosion and killed hundreds of innocent people.
Last but not least, despite developing modern technologies and plants to store waste from atomic production, scientist did not yet researched how to ecologically recycle waste production. Waste products are in believe, securely stored far down below the ground level and there is no enough evidence, that in future the waste could be recycled. Hence, Australian activist encouraged local authorities and government to ban nuclear productions as well as storage in Australia.
To sum up, as far as discovering usage of nuclear energy might seem economically affordable and eco-friendly, the opposite is true. Human error as well as weather could lead to negative consequences which affect the world for thousands of years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'did' requires base form of the verb: 'research'
Suggestion: research
...tomic production, scientist did not yet researched how to ecologically recycle waste produ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, second, secondly, so, still, well, for instance, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58387096774 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84143747238 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616129032258 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7537969758 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.1875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171750354562 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597549506067 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535620331798 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107287044835 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473195401446 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.