Since the last few years, the sustainability of young employees has become more questionable. They switch their jobs frequently due to various reasons and beliefs. But it’s not necessary that everyone gets benefited from such behavior. I firmly believe that hopping from one to another has more disadvantages than advantages.
In today’s fast paced and competitive life, employers have numerous options to fill a job position. But to find a better fit, they are ready to offer more salary than the candidate's last company, even though it’s higher than industry standards. Such attractions have encouraged many employees to switch their jobs more frequently. Whereas many job seekers lack the sense of adjustment to a new environment and job. Therefore many candidates try to switch their career, just because they don’t feel comfortable with their current company or the kind of work they do regularly.
While looking for short term benefits, people can not realise the long term loss. Due to higher frequency of job switching, mutual trust between employer and employee has been decreased, which is why organizations raise questions on the loyalty of employees. Furthermore, with such a mindset of employees, institutes have to make hiring and training expenses so frequently that they are now almost a recurring expense for most of the companies. And therefore they have started giving loyalty and integrity the utmost importance while hiring a person.
Based on all practical scenarios, it’s very much rational that for long term sustainability of a job, one should avoid switching jobs and careers frequently. There are more disadvantages to that than there are advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...djustment to a new environment and job. Therefore many candidates try to switch their car...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38721804511 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87928941507 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612781954887 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5342105168 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157835667752 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519858243903 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385660653806 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946778294635 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353560878422 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.