Most of the food supplies consumed by people these days are produced in farms built in far-flung areas. Some people argue that manufacturing food products in local farms is environmentally and economically more beneficial. In my opinion, although it has a few drawbacks, the positive impacts largely outweigh the negative effects.
The disadvantages of depending on local food only are as follows. Firstly, in developing countries, local farms are often built on a small scale so, they do not have enough manpower or resources to generate quantities of food supplies needed to sustain a large fraction of population. Furthermore, such farms are also not equipped with advanced technologies so their manufacturing capabilities are outdated and limited.
However, I strongly believe, that advantages outweigh the disadvantages. To begin with, food prepared in local farms does not need transportation and proves to be highly cost-effective because consumers can get it at cheaper rates. Moreover, large quantities of fuel used for transportation is also eliminated which eventually leads to a significant decrease in environmental pollution. Secondly, people can get fresh vegetables and fruits, free from preservatives required for keeping food safe during import process. Finally, local population is empowered because masses are more independent in creating flavors and types of foods they like to consume. On top of it, by serving the farms working to cater their needs, masses are able to contribute in their local economy more effectively.
In conclusion, although importing edible goods from far-away areas is remarkably popular, I am of the opinion that depending on local farms is more advantageous financially as well as environmentally. Hence, government needs to empower local farmers so that population can reap the benefits of their locality to a maximum extent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54355400697 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22749662294 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616724738676 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4994331026 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294760395733 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988338196591 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739244718068 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172485262863 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691463423118 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.