Today’s fresh food like vegetables or fruits travels thousands of miles from the rural areas or farms before it reaches customers in cities or urban areas.
Why is this? Is this a positive or negative trend?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
It is clear that consumers, especially those living in metropolitan and urban areas, would usually spend much time waiting for fresh food which is transported from remote rural places or plantations. In my opinion, there are many reasons for the long distance of fresh food grown in farms, and this phenomenon could lead to many harmful impacts on customers and farmers.
There is no denying that delivering food from remote farms is likely to be caused by both the national polices and the public’s demand. To decrease noticeable pressure in megacities, governments tend to enter some policies in order to encourage citizens to migrate and build the rural areas. By lending cheap or completely-free plantations located far from cities and urban areas, the local authorities seem to be successful in developing them, however, it would take longer time to deliver agricultural products to customers. Furthermore, most residents settling down in the crowded cities are willing to pay the higher prices for fresh food which is labeled as ‘organic’ or ‘directly-from-farm’ products than others living in rural places. As a result, farmers would intend to transport their products to the megacities rather than other places with less opportunities for profitable promises.
With the developing tendency, I personally find a variety of negative effects not only on customers but also on farmers. Undoubtedly, to ensure agricultural food to be fresh and attractive, many mechadizers are able to use various damaging chemicals when it comes to long-distance food transportation. It also means that customers now choose the food covered with chemicals insteading of the purest and freshest one like advertising. Due to the transportation within miles, the traders have more chances to force farmers who have to sell their products with low prices, regardless of famers’ attempts to harvest their crops. While the farmers gain little benefit and profit, consumers have still spent large amounts of money purchasing agricultural food.
In conclusion, I believe that food transportation from remote places to cities have no positive benefit although there are various reasons why agricultural food is usually grown in the remote places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 852, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun opportunities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...egacities rather than other places with less opportunities for profitable promises. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also on farmers. Undoubtedly, to ensure agricultural food to be fresh and attrac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, still, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44252873563 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12146219349 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577586206897 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.4974788671 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.692307692 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7692307692 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198977050431 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069291870073 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463746320604 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128372909431 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376712623965 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.