In today’s world of science and technology, we still greatly value our artists suchas musician, writers, painters. What can arts tell us about that science and technology cannot?
Nowadays, people are living in a digital age that science and technology achieved such a credible achievement. However, the aesthetic qualities of arts which were created by artists are still cherished thank to the priceless value that they have given to humans.
First of all, it is certainly true that arts have ability to boost our emotions and change people’s feelings especially, music and literary. Many psychologists proved that music is one of the effective methods which could be used to cure patience of psychology because listening to music is able to lift up people’s mood and take out the stresses. For literary, It is contributable to widen the knowledge and change the way people see the world. The talented playwrights putting people in both pessimistic and optimistic scenario help them always willing to deal with difficulties in those real lives.
Secondly, the rich literary ans artistic heritage give people chance to exploit the culture an dhistory of a nation. Arts and history always go abreast with each other or in other word, arts reflect how the past actually was. For instance, in 1940s, Vietnam was in chaos, the famine due to a dearth of food, illiteracy because of war and there are many different disasters that were depicted in most of work of literary and paintings at that time such as “Tat den” by Ngo Tat To, “Lao Hac” by Nam Cao. Furthermore, arts also provide a link to our roots. It towards people to the old value that would take shape in a strong sense of identity of a person. Another proof is the folk song festival held every year still attracts a huge of people, not only old people but also the young generations to visit.
In conclusion, although I accept that science ans technology make life easier than ever but I still believe that the position of arts as well as artists cannot be replace thank to the entertaining value and the nationalism that people got from their.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | bminhanh01 | 89 | view |
- Early technological developments helped ordinary people changed their lives more than recent developments. To what exent do you agree or disagree. 84
- In today’s world of science and technology, we still greatly value our artists suchas musician, writers, painters. What can arts tell us about that science and technology cannot? 89
- Early technological developments helped ordinary people changed their lives more than recent developments To what extend do you agree or disagree 93
- Children who start reading earlier in life, perform better on their school studies .How important are early reading skills in a child’s academic performance?What other preschool factors influence a child’s academic achievements? 89
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ve people chance to exploit the culture an dhistory of a nation. Arts and history ...
^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1940s'.
Suggestion: in the 1940s
...ow the past actually was. For instance, in 1940s, Vietnam was in chaos, the famine due t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...illiteracy because of war and there are many different disasters that were depicted in most of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nationalism that people got from their.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92168674699 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68904893553 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611445783133 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.757535944 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.692307692 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180464987014 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602288607221 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464457118301 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121728415248 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476938890389 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.