Today social skills are being more and more emphasized by employers. Some people believe that social skills are important besides good qualifications for their job success. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
For a long time ago, qualifications are the main factor in evaluating the employees. Nowadays, the job market is developing at intensive speeds. Besides the good qualifications, the employers want the job-seeker to have interpersonal skills essential to owning a successful career. From my perspective, it is a positive tendency.
Good qualifications play an important role in one's career because they are generally good indicators of a person's capability and specialized knowledge. All employers take the first glance at a candidate's qualification because they want to make sure that the job-seeker could do the work-related task without making mistakes. Moreover, the formal qualifications demonstrate that the employees have a foundation knowledge to involve in-depth research and development such as information technology, computer science, and medicine. Without academic skills, the worker will have poor work performance and stand a high chance of being hired.
However, the employees who have an outstanding career are good at academic and social skills. Interpersonal skills are essential soft skills that are becoming a positive tendency to evaluate the value of a worker. The first reason which makes social skills is vital is human interaction. Human interaction in the workplace involves team production, with workers playing off each other's strengths and adapting flexibly to changing circumstances. Almost every job requires human interaction. For instance, in the designing process, the discussion of everyone in a team plays a vital role in creating a good appearance of one specific good. Furthermore, human-to-human interactions can improve employee engagement. High levels of engagement foster customer loyalty, retention of talent, and improve organizational performance. Secondly, interpersonal skills can be an essential aspect of staff interaction, planning, collaboration. For example, if we work on a team, we need to get along well with others, or if we are managers, we will be called upon to motivate employees. Without social skills, those works can be done effectively. In the future, it is going to harm the development of the company.
To sum up, we have understood the importance of stellar credentials. Without it, we could do the work-related assignment. If we want to build up a career, we must have proper qualifications and social skills. Both of them are essential ingredients for the success of any professional.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ualifications play an important role in ones career because they are generally good ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...they are generally good indicators of a persons capability and specialized knowledge. A...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'candidates'' or 'candidate's'?
Suggestion: candidates'; candidate's
...ll employers take the first glance at a candidates qualification because they want to make...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... harm the development of the company. To sum up, we have understood the import...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2085.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57486631016 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36799599299 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6666463216 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.875 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5833333333 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208789013471 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566662275389 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479452731066 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129892871329 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323933164479 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.