Today, some food travels thousands of miles from farms to consumers. Some people think that it would be better to our environment and economy if people only eat locally produced food. To what extent do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
One of the most debatable issue today relates to some individuals think if eat the locally produced food it is better for environment. Presenting my view I would intend to explore aforementioned view in following paragraphs.
On one side of the argument that the people who argue that locally produced food better for economy considerably outweigh it's disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is that it is obviously Favourable because if the people purchase food from to food travel so it tend to be increase the economical burden on the people. The most evident would be that if a country a product and sold by same country as a consequence it is best for their development and higher rank in countries. For instance, the recent survey findings and clear that now a days Japan became more fame because they sale the product same country.
However, a definite actions could be take to mitigate of if the food are purchased by the food travelers so there are couple of shortcomings. The most unfeavourable quality might be that higher cost of tax paid by the government to purchase the outside country food. Another stumbling block might be that if the country grain cannot sold by the local individual rather than it directly impacted on the local farmers and it is difficult to pay the highest cost of the pesticides and fertilizers where as farmers have got many issues to regard this problem they how to complete the cost of crop.
To conclusion, although there are good reason to purchase the outside country food. But opinion rules must be make by government to purchase the locally produced food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-06 | Gurpreet_5577 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-06 | Gurpreet_5577 | 73 | view |
- The maps below show the village of stockeford in 1930 and 2010. 11
- With the increase demand of fuel people should look at the other untouched fuel places. Do you agree or disagree . 73
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers,and mobile phones in communication has negative effects on young people's reading and writing skills. 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 52
- The graph below shows the average montly salary and the prices of white television. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tends'?
Suggestion: tends
...purchase food from to food travel so it tend to be increase the economical burden on...
^^^^
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...e recent survey findings and clear that now a days Japan became more fame because they sal...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'action'?
Suggestion: action
...duct same country. However, a definite actions could be take to mitigate of if the foo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... cost of the pesticides and fertilizers where as farmers have got many issues to regard ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85507246377 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74411975626 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536231884058 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.9115100135 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.818181818 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280544625501 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112769647843 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873636334249 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170047840207 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402852616475 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.