Today, Tv channels broadcast men's sports shows more than women's sport shows. Why is this case ? Should Tv channels give equal showtime for each ?
In contemporary settings, tv channels are used to broadcast huge number of sports shows of male and provide them more priority instead of female related shows. There are numerous reasons due to which this case is happened. However, there should be necessity to promote equal preferability to these shows. Couple of view points are explained in forthcoming paragraphs.
It is worth considering that, number of male relates to sports shows are promoted by tv broadcasts and avoid opposite sex which reveals to plenty of reasons. First and foremost is major priority of male in society because of their empowerment. In this criteria, society provides maximum of preferability towards men because they are considered as dominant character since ancestral times. Due to which, this leads to discrimination between gender which results to represent low characteristics of women in public. Furthermore, another prominent factor is more demanding in media therefore, superior number of men are allowed to participate in sports section. Due to this, they become viable to leads toward popularity which results to play crucial role in advertising skill with collaboration of business companies. Thus, youngsters become more interact towards them and prohibit valuable role of women. Hence, this opines to maximum of sports shows related to males on tv channel insted of females.
On contrast, there should be necessity to change trend of this notion because of numerous particular reasons which represents favourable aspect to couple of females and society. Firstly, demolition of discrimination in between genders. Because, when society provides equal importance and opportunity to females. Thus, this leads to vanish criticism regards sex in society. Moreover, another factor is provide superior opportunity to indicates women empowerment and status in front of public. Due to which, they become viable to participate in all business sections wheather it is sports or other which leads to progression of nation. As a result, they reveal their supreme identification and spread equality in society.
To recapitulate, from my prospective, although there are reasonable factors due to which tv channels promote such sport shows in which men is included. Yet, there are also beneficial sections regards female when they recieve equal valuable role.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...e is happened. However, there should be necessity to promote equal preferability to these...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'sport'.
Suggestion: sport
...idering that, number of male relates to sports shows are promoted by tv broadcasts and...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ociety because of their empowerment. In this criteria, society provides maximum of p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...females. On contrast, there should be necessity to change trend of this notion because ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...in society. Moreover, another factor is provide superior opportunity to indicates women...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s regards female when they recieve equal valuable role.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51810584958 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93179159559 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512534818942 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2169484312 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0952380952 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61904761905 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274978978991 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784412794046 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876785133252 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192111773857 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067933304643 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.