In the trend of civilizationciviallization updated in our today world, many TV channels broadcast more male sport shows than femalethan the female one. From my observation, I think that the biggest reason that leads to this phenomenon is the fundamental thoughts of the inequalityunequality between men and women and I think that TV channels should provide the equal time for both genders' sports.
There are more and more TV programs that broadcastprograms broadcast the men's sport shows and the reason that results in this problem is the rooty definition of the unfair treatmenttreat between two sex. From the past until now, many people havehas a strong belief that the heavy activities that require huge amountsamount of energy are justis just only for men and men are the dominant players indominants of the sportssport field. Viewers tend to be impressedto impressed and attracted by mainly the sports shows of the male gender rather thangender than the other one because they want to watch such a strong and highly competitive match between men and men. Taking the Fox channels on TV for the instant example, the matches of the men are often shownshowed at the official time of the day or can be so-called thethat the golden time with the long period of broadcasting time.
From this overview of this trend, I strongly believe that the TV channels should provide equalprovide the equal time for male and female sports shows. By this way, the sport shows can not only gaining more viewers and fans for the female's sport games but also creating the fair playground to give the opportunities for many women who has the talents and passions in the sport industry, which also mean that the TV channels can gain more revenue and favors from the sport's viewers community.
To sum up, nowadays there is a significant rise in men's sports shows being shown on different TV channels than the women's onesone due to the existenceexist of the traditional belief of humankind so the TV channels should create equalitycreate the equality in showing time schedulesschedule for both genders in the sporty events programs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun TV seems to be countable; consider using: 'many TVs'.
Suggestion: many TVs
...iallization updated in our today world, many TV channels broadcast more male sport show...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'gain'
Suggestion: gain
... this way, the sport shows can not only gaining more viewers and fans for the females s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03125 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06322068388 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514204545455 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 20.2975951904 192% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.084049748 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 196.777777778 106.682146367 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.1111111111 20.7667163134 188% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.561513996707 0.244688304435 229% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244730478644 0.084324248473 290% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103114392304 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.38519882216 0.151304729494 255% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444395986932 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 13.0946893788 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.1190380762 174% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.