Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is argued that speaking is a more powerful communication tool than writing. From my point of view, I firmly agree with that statement for some reasons.

The first reason why I give my strong support to the idea is that it contains direct communication with both language and emotion. This is because spoken communication can transmit words faster to givers, making the conservation more fluently and comfortably. As a result, this type of communication can be time-saving and expand social cycles and boost higher working productivity in a simple way. For example, businessmen often have many face-to-face meetings instead of requiring employees to make a writing. This has successfully proved that spoken communication brings positive impacts for their career.

Another reason is that spoken communication is the first thing humans learn when they are born. People are taught to speak from their first days in life. Therefore, people give more preference to this way of communication rather than writing. If people promote the intelligence in speaking field, even at whatever age, they will get greater chances to move further in their life. This can be exemplified in some chidren aged 3 but they can attract a lot of attentions from the viewers for their interesting and flexible way of speaking. Not every viewers are ready to spend time on reading some line of words, so spoken communication is obviously more effective in the social life.

In conclusion, I hold my firm belief that spoken communication have more potential benefits than writing one. It is expected that spoken communication have been and always be the most popular on the world.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be time-saving and expand social cycles and boost higher working productivity in...
^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a simple way" with adverb for "simple"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... and boost higher working productivity in a simple way. For example, businessmen often have ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16296296296 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92765068715 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9241830677 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.9333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300176308316 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111928064235 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075571702839 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201106584799 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317115448225 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.