Topic 11/5/19: Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills, such as cooperative skills. What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions?
It is increasingly common to see graduates, despite their bachelor’s degree, fail to master the most fundamental interpersonal skills, such as teamwork. This phenomenon concerns firms and corporations, who worry that their new employees cannot meet the working standards. Several reasons and solutions for this problem will be mentioned in this writing.
Newly recruited staff’s lack of collaboration can be attributed to both their education and family backgrounds. Firstly, the education system is at times too theory-based with little practice. This leaves no room for communication among students and they have few opportunities to practice teamwork skills. For instance, Vietnamese schools only require students to listen to lectures and cram for exams individually. Another cause is that many children are over-indulged by their parents leading to heightened selfishness and self-importance. This can be explained by the one-child policy due to overpopulation and the high living standards in many countries. As a result, young adults do not recognize the need to share and to work harmoniously in a group.
However, there might be some effective solutions to combat this issue. In terms of education, teachers should make attempts to renovate the curriculum and incorporate more group work. This would give students the chance to express themselves, listen to others and negotiate for ideas. Evidently, many institutions worldwide have adopted multiple group assignment syllabi for students to practice team-working skills. Secondly, it is parents’ responsibility to learn proper parenting. Once their awareness is risen, they can bring up independent yet cooperative individuals for the future job market. Finally, enterprises can make a change by offering training sessions for their own staff to boost group membership.
To conclude, while I agree that new employees have not mastered collaborative skills, I also believe that this can be mitigated by the cooperative action of teachers, parents and the businesses themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-06 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | HuynhHoa | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | 9ngóntay | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-19 | Oanh Pham | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-13 | Thu Phuong Dang | 56 | view |
- Topic 07 06 19 More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Topic 04 05 19 Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports What are the reasons for this and is it a positive or negative development 84
- Topic 06 04 19 People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- Topic 23 5 19 In many cities there is little control on the design and construction of new homes and office buildings and people can build houses in their own style What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a situation 78
- Topic 13 4 19 In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food that can be grown in their local area As a result much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvan 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73442622951 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22358614888 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652459016393 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8004328974 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110565718924 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331243466313 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383684904967 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763353168616 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278866769597 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.