The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
In this modern era, the custom of families having a meal together is no longer appear. This problem happens due to several reasons and is likely to lead to some effects on society.
To begin with, there are several causes of this trend. First of all, each family member might have different working or studying plans on a day, which can lead to a mismatch among family member's schedules. Consequently, it is extremely hard for every family member to sit down to have a meal together. Furthermore, young people, these days prefer eating out with their friends, colleagues or business partners. Besides, due to the fast-paced of modern cities, people tend to choose fast-food restaurants or food vendors on the streets with a vast array of foods and prices in this day and age. They can grab a meal to be quickly recharged after stressful hours at school or work, which can cause their lack of appetite, and therefore, they will skip meals with their families.
There are various impacts on society and individuals. First of all, people will be much more flexible with their time, which means that they can save a lot of time as they do not have to show up at a fixed hour to have meals with their families. They can eat whatever and whenever they want even during working. Besides, this trend might make the family bond weaken. Mealtimes used to be occasions when family members ate together, discussed each members' problems, and gave advice to each other. Since a family continuously eats separately, the family bond cannot be strengthened and people can feel isolated.
In conclusion, the fact that the custom of families eating meals together is disappearing is caused by several elements, and various effects might be caused by this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-10 | trần ngọc tuấn | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-13 | Huy Vu | 73 | view |
- Nowadays people have little awareness of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons and how can people learn more about natural world 82
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of job required 84
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 61
- I dont know 11
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of job required 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85953177258 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49564670585 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1995850605 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164893841653 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638286044032 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503986815132 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12669952622 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038301839974 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.