I think the current teaching methodologies followed by educational institutions are old fashioned and in most cases they undermine the creativity and learning skills of certain students. Therefore, many education experts are raising their voice in demand of new ways of learning.
To elaborate, the existing education system concentrates more on injecting subject matter in to young brains and obtain best results in the form of grades. However, this confines a students' ability to become more creative. To illustrate, all the schools in India follow a same pattern of testing the bookish knowledge acquired from repetitive teaching. Consequently, many pupils lag behind in some areas and never really can focus on further studies.
Alternatively, if schools follow a practical approach, more and more students get benefited. In other words, reducing the amount of book reading and conducting realtime projects enables a student to get a better understanding of the subject. Additionally, exploring artistic and sport activities equally with academics gives more options and subsequently the interests of a child can be known at a very early age. For instance, a research conducted by Schools Standards Commission revealed that more than 60 percent of schools does not have any amenities for sport activities. This approach of competitive learning puts more pressure from peers and is definitely harmful.
In conclusion, I assert that the existing education system is out of date and hence needs an alteration as suggested by many scholars. Otherwise, nothing good comes out of routine learning methods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...orm of grades. However, this confines a students ability to become more creative. To ill...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in most cases, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50403225806 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01040674616 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677419354839 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2229253093 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222127692193 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663360212427 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527113844954 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12380328325 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375448314693 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.