Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Does advantage outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a growing tendency that traffic and acommodation problems are increasing. Some solutions are given to ameliorate this bad state. One of them is that the government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to countryside. Personally, I believe that the drawbacks of this solution are more significant than the benefits.
On the one hand, there are several benefits of this solution. Firstly. road may be widen and cities can construct more accommodations. When some companies move to countryside, cities may have a number of blank spaces, so people may use these spaces to build houses or roads. Secondly, there will be an icrease in quantity of empty accommodations and a substantial decrease in the volume of transport. People who work in those companies may go to rural areas to live when the government implement this solution. This will reduce the populatin of cities.
On the other hand, I would argue that the drawbacks of this opinion outweigh its advantages. The ability of buying commodities in countryside is lower than in cities, so companies may meet a huge difficulty. Moreover, rural areas may not have enough conditions such as electricity, transport for business activities. It is a big adversity because they are fundamental conditions to run a business.
In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that the solution of encouraging some business to move from cities to countryside has more problems than benefits
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Road
...ral benefits of this solution. Firstly. road may be widen and cities can construct m...
^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... because they are fundamental conditions to run a business. In conclusion, I fir...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17446808511 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05158902272 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570212765957 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4579856341 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0666666667 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245243384206 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774443746494 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109358641426 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170142889032 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970137621304 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.