The trend of on line shopping is increasing significantly. What effect does it have on the environment and society in general.
It is undisputed that shopping has become an indispensable part of everyone's life. Presently, the use of on line shopping is tremendously increasing around the world. Here, I would like to account the effect of this happening on the environment and society.
There are manifold negative outcomes of on line shopping on the community. First and foremost, a massive number of people have become extravagant on account of e-shopping. To demonstrate, nowadays people tendency to visit on line shopping websites where they are fully attracted towards astonishing product that are shown in the great packages. Besides that, the websites influence the consumer's buying behaviour by offering heavy discounts, special offers such buy one get one free. consequently, people become intend to buy unnecessary products.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, buying excessive things direct towards the problem of rubbish. As an evidence, people buy more and more new things that are packed into the plastic boxes and wrappers. Ultimately, such wrappers and plastic boxes are deliberately thrown on the vacant lands besides reusing it.
In addition to it, a considerable rise in the amount of rubbish degrades the quality of environment. To the specific, non-biodegradable things remain on the land for the prolong period decline the quality and fertility of soil. As a result, rubbish problem has become the serious concern in modern societies.
To recapitulate. undeniably, on line shopping has numerous effects. It is clear that it has become rising problem on societies. So that, people and government should take proactive measures to eliminate this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-25 | binita karki | 95 | view |
| 2018-10-25 | binita karki | 61 | view |
| 2018-10-25 | binita karki | 71 | view |
| 2018-08-07 | PRAMODH k | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-08 | honza | 78 | view |
- Some people think that government should invest in arts and cultural events. Others think that government should invest money on more important things. 78
- Do you think that technological advancement has brought more harm than good Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion It is undeniable fact that technologies have been developing day by day and it has changed the society and lifestyles of p 86
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at 73
- The table shows the change in the percentage of people joining in seven different sports from 1999 to 2009. 84
- Some people think that government should invest in arts and cultural events. Others think that government should invest money on more important things. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...ecial offers such buy one get one free. consequently, people become intend to buy unnecessar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
... intend to buy unnecessary products. Further emphasizing on my point of view, buying...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...egradable things remain on the land for the prolong period decline the quality and fertilit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Undeniably
...n modern societies. To recapitulate. undeniably, on line shopping has numerous effects....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, if, so, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45348837209 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98800005728 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585271317829 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6206598007 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7647058824 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1764705882 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125810137091 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420352089843 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605548366199 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713170532372 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753178856315 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.