Under the British and Australian laws jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record this protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach the decision about the case.
In this present era, the crime rate has been booming exponentially - it is the issue of debate for most of the nations. In British and Australian laws judge in delinquency case has no access to past record of history seaters, which conceal the facts of real criminal. Advocates have addressed that this system ought to be reformed and provide history of offenders to the jury before making decision. I will discuss both these views before coming to my opinion.
On one hand, all countries have different rules, regulations and laws, in some nations there is a equal punishment : death penalty for all types of delinquencies, while, in other societies judge make decisions regarding to the lawless activities : murder; thefting; robbery and so on. Fcew countries do not check the previous occurrences of the culprit directly cater the judgement, it is not better mean of judging because it assists to protect those people, who are the actual intelligent felons. For an instance, one of the European countries - Austria, where many history sheeters are not punished because based on the presentation of lawyers they could not be done any baleful activities on account of their personality and kindness, which the neighbours and witnesses confess.
On the other hand, in many nations of the world jury checks the delinquency record of the offenders before making a judgement upon penalty, it is very benevolent for judges because it makes easy to take decision. For an example, one of the Asian societies - India, where juries are provided the history of culprit : his education; profession; mental health and previous activities, which breach the rules and regulation and judge can make decision not only early but also proper.
In my opinion, it is a great way to punished by illuminating the past of criminal, which shows everything, which has done by them previously and helps to make proper decision.
To conclude, if judge cater judgement without checking records, which protects the real victim, so, it is better to illuminate the history in order to give exact punishment to intelligent felons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | comTDK | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | anna103 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | anna103 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | vuthuy2210 | 89 | view |
- Many people play sport when they are young but then stop when they become adults Why do so many adults stop doing physical exercise What can be done to solve this problem 78
- Some people think that cars are the best way to travel in a city while others think that bicycle is better Discuss both points of views and give your opinion 61
- The table below shows Top 10 countries with largest population in 2019 and how it is projected to change by 2100
- Today children are spending much more time watching ki compared to the past Why do you think this happens In this a positive or negative 92
- One of the biggest problems facing the world today is growing enough food to feed the ever expanding population Genetically Modified foods are the best way to solve this issue To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ions and laws, in some nations there is a equal punishment : death penalty for al...
^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th and previous activities, which breach the rules and regulation and judge can m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, while, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13994169096 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76904115824 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574344023324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7198168154 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.272727273 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1818181818 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138621039237 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057613388014 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583843584334 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732034291906 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791772147656 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.