One of the major issues in the world today is not having a job. The Primary reasons are the ever-increasing global population and adopting more and more artificial intelligence in industries. Hence, to get rid of the matter, expansion of the workforce and incorporation of more human labor can be done.
With the rising population, all over the world, the demand for everything rises, and employment is not an exception in this regard. In other words, the competition for jobs increases day by day; however, the existing opportunities cannot meet the demand, thereby increasing the number of jobless people. According to the annual newsletter of the national labor department, unemployment has risen by 60% over the last 10 years in Sri Lanka. In addition to the uncontrolled growth of the population, the growing number of robots in industries fires employees leading to unemployment. Put simply, a considerable number of jobs, which can be done by humans, are performed by machines. This is supported by recent research conducted by Oxford University, in which they claimed that 70000 people aged 25 to 30 lost their jobs in 2020due to the installation of machines.
In terms of a solution, the current job market should be expanded to compete with the increasing number of jobless individuals. This can be achieved by increasing the production of food and other essential items, which is capable of solving both unemployment and other needs of the growing population. Farming, for instance, is a good example, whereby a large number of people can be provided with a career opportunity. Not only does the expansion of the workforce, but the replacement of robots with manual labor would also be a good solution. For example, most of the tea factories in Pakistan have switched to manual packing by absorbing a lot of youth without compromising efficiency.
In conclusion, losing jobs has become a deteriorating problem worldwide. The principal elements of this problem are the rising population and artificial intelligence. As solutions, creating more opportunities and depending on humans can be done.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to the installation of machines. In terms of a solution, the current job ...
^^^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...or instance, is a good example, whereby a large number of people can be provided with a career op...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22941176471 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11386563126 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6101195834 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.588235294 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.062819532928 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219597573123 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0230347588235 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.042820368162 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135679538381 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.