For centuries, many societies at global levels have been influenced by the prevailed stereotype mentality across both the sexes. In this context, many people are of the view that for a progressive and unbiased nation, the most essential step is to provide equal higher educational opportunities to both genders. I am in accord with the given statement and believe that while living in an unprejudiced society, where both the genders avail the freedom of equal study rights, the development of the nation can not be halted. This essay would endeavor to shed some light on the supporting ideas for my agreement on the given aspect.
To begin with, the first justification for my consent to the statement is the emergence of a balanced economic structure. Despite creating a strong foundation for a healthy nation, equal educational scenarios keep unethical elements like disparity and discrimination at bay to discourage gender inequality. Moreover, it stimulates women to be a part of higher public and political sectors, where women always recorded a lower rank in the past. For instance, a study has shown that nearly 40% of the countries witnessed fewer women as compared to men in higher sectorial positions. Hence, by avoiding discrepancy in admission criteria, women can get qualified enough to create eminent positions in their society.
Furthermore, with the advent of globalization, the need for an efficient workforce is rising dramatically. As a result, women are gaining tremendous importance in the working sector. Besides this, the presence of some special traits and will power to prove a high level of intelligence in challenging areas have improved their visibility on the educational and work front. Hence, to endorse women to take leading roles, while mitigating the wage disparity at work, universities should follow some strict regulations in fair admission criteria as done by high-tech companies. For example, many big corporations have fixed an equal number of positions for each sex.
To conclude, it is erroneous to say that women are less talented than men, instead of, in my opinion, equal educational prospects are highly synonymous with a nation's success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... prospects are highly synonymous with a nations success.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, while, as for, for example, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30459770115 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97721674169 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2518551771 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.066666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848488297146 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0265339324337 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319116335265 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0547222798569 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168763314386 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.