University education should be free for all students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The prevalence of tertiary education has been appealing to a variety of students with diverse backgrounds and religions to secure a place at university. Although this might enlighten why policy-makers contend that university tuition fees exemption should be granted to all undergraduates, I am opposed to this view.
On the one hand, the subsidised education system will benefit tertiary students in certain ways. The initial benefit is to ease students’ financial burdens, which might improve their academic performance. In practice, higher education students with the back of free tuition schemes are able to steer clear of a part-time work, which, in turn, is likely to facilitate them to achieve exceptional academic test scores. Another advantage is to provide students with precious opportunities to invest on set texts and reference books. Attending a university with fee remission could help students to spend expenditures purchasing textbooks, which might aid their academic purposes at university.
On the other hand, zero tuition education might have detrimental effects on lecturers’ income as well as university facilities. The fact that students are not required to pay their tuition fees could lead to a significant decrease in teachers’ income. Take Vietnam as a prime example, fee remission schemes applied for those students specialized in teacher education exerts severe pressure on lecturers’ financial problems, resulting in the ineffectiveness of teaching and learning activities since those distinguished lecturers need to allocate their time in extra classes in a bid to earn supplement income. In tandem with this, providing a free-education system will deteriorate learning equipment. Lack of revenue stemming from free of tuition fees might lead to the decline in university budget, which fails to upgrade cutting-edge technology to meet students’ learning demand.
In conclusion, although having students attending university without paying tuition fees might motivate them to enhance their academic results, this will put teachers’ income along with learning facilities at risks. Therefore, it is my firm conviction that undergraduates should take on their payment responsibility to the university
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 876, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to demand'
Suggestion: to demand
...e technology to meet students’ learning demand. In conclusion, although having stude...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77945619335 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15231572087 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570996978852 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4943686237 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.642857143 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198381012529 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739060614115 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241384454518 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127388483112 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237523297164 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.