Some people believe that rich countries should provide poorer countries with help that is not financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undeniable that economically disadvantaged countries are encountering a plethora of obstacles which require silver bullets to address. While it is believed that affluent countries should not aid less developed countries financial but other supports, I completely agree with this view.
On the one hand, financial supports from well-off countries are likely to trigger a host of unanticipated problems to the home country. It is true that receiving foreign subsidise will deteriorate the sluggish economic progression for the well-endowed nation. This is because those poorer countries might depend excessively on foreign investment without paying attention to strengthening their economy, which might exacerbate existing economic hardship. Another potential issue of receiving economic assistance is to weaken its position in the world on a global-scale phenomenon. For instance, low-income developing countries tend to be affected by anti-identity theft schemes from economically powerful nations, including America and other western countries.
On the other hand, first aids and educational supports appear to be the ultimate solution that foreign countries might consider deliberately. Bilateral relations in the field of education and training is enhancing the effectiveness of tertiary education in less well-off countries. Take Vietnam as a prime example, English language skills of Vietnamese students with USA educators’ supports has been improved significantly, which might help them to conquer their English language effectively. Additionally, training frontline medical staff to harness cutting-edge technology in treating and surgeries might help poor countries increase the life chances of patients. This is likely to strengthen the capacity of healthcare services system in poorer countries.
In conclusion, although financial hardship might be mitigated by overseas direct investment from affluent countries; however, this could lead to several unanticipated problems above. Therefore, it is my firm conviction that medical and education supports are among effective assistances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-13 | baretta | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-21 | fatemeh norouzi | 89 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | fatemeh norouzi | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-28 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 84
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their families and friends Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Nowadays environmental problems are too big for individual countries or people to solve We have reached the stage where we need cooperation on an international level to protect the environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many parts of the world some famous people are considered as role models and they are having an increasing influence on the young Is this a positive or negative development 89
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16610169492 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19047706843 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613559322034 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1554778926 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.928571429 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188507821529 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647338963708 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827968727381 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126571584568 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099008733861 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.51 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.