Nowadays the university tuition fees have increased comparatively from the previous decade. It is a contentious issue among the communities whether this educational payment paid by the students only benefits them or it will also bring welfare for society. I partly agree with the statement and in the following paragraphs, I will give reasons for my partial agreement.
To begin with, the university authorities utilize this tuition fee in different sectors such as improvement of residence of the students and give them various facilities like the internet in individual rooms and so on. In addition, most of the money they used for the study purposes, for example, purchasing lab equipment so that students can do research to invent something new which will be beneficial for human beings. For example, a few years ago in Bangladesh, one of the agriculture graduate scholars invented a new type of rice genome that gives more rice than the others. It helps greatly to remove the food scarcity from the country. Moreover, they spend the student donation money for making the university environment educational so that the pupils can learn different things.
On the other hand, their provided money is also used for the prosperity of the country. Some portions of their tuition fees add with the total budget of the country which is used for the development of the country. Not only that but their money is also utilized for the well-being of society. For instance, in Khulna University, the tertiary authorities give funds to the student well-fare department to educate illiterate adult people. In addition, when any natural disaster happens in the country such as a storm or flood then the university gives money through students to help people.
In conclusion, to sum up all the points above, it is clear that the fees that the scholars give the university for admission are not only used for them but also for society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06269592476 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7348254157 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53605015674 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7339071508 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.357142857 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155072350776 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562476582089 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458030116222 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105062040617 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305551127344 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.