Universities have functioned as the most important institution for the purpose of developing intellectuals in a country. Nowadays, more and more people have started the discussion over whether those who go to universities should pay the full tuition without any subsidy from the government. Some reckon that college students should not enjoy the subsidy from the government because it only benefits the students instead of the whole society. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this statement.
Higher Education is beneficial for not only the students themselves but also the whole society. In our society, it is knowledgeable people that propel the development of the new technology, medicine, or new ideas. For example, in medical industry, without people who are rich in the knowledge of pharmacy, we cannot develop effective medicine for use to fight the outbreak of disease. People might suffer from the epidemic severely, causing hundreds of thousands of death in the globe. Also, without the training of higher education, we might not able to explore the universe, like we do now, that much. We might still know nothing about what is happening outside our atmosphere. Higher Education also cultivates people's critical and logical thinking. Thanks to this, we are able to open our mind to the world, embracing the difference, and decreasing the discrimination. Therefore, I would not say that attending universities benefits only the individuals. It benefits the whole society.
Concerning the issue that who should pay for the tuition fee, I reckon that students do not have to pay the all costs of their studies but part of the costs, because I believe that higher education institute is like a profit organisation. Where there is the demand there is the supply. If a person wants to become knowledgeable, s/he needs to pay for it. Apart from the time s/he has spent, the person needs to be charged to enjoy the service, that is, teaching in this sense. However, because students will also contribute to our society and provide what they have learnt, it is not reasonable to have them pay for the all costs.
In a nutshell, I advocate for the idea that students do benefits our society in the long run and they do not have to pay for the all costs of their studies but partially of it.
- The only way to solve increasing crime rate of young offenders is to teach parents better parenting skills To what extent do you agree 78
- More and more people work at home and study at home with the development of computer technology Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- Living in big cities is bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
- More and more people work at home and study at home with the development of computer technology Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- More and more people work at home and study at home with the development of computer technology Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...e cannot develop effective medicine for use to fight the outbreak of disease. Peopl...
^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nstitute is like a profit organisation. Where there is the demand there is the supply...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of their studies but partially of it.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, apart from, for example, i reckon
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01558441558 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7996939813 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.902905727 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.55 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30625819412 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084453545454 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883034425074 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19839506606 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529821458045 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.