The use of corporal punishment (physically hitting students) in schools is in decline, yet it should be used to improve behaviour.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Like the two sides of a coin, there are debates regarding the use of corporal punishment for better behaviour. Various points pertaining to the negative effects of such punishment have been highlighted below supporting my views against such actions.
Firstly, in India such punishment are popular as teachers find it as the easiest way to alter an young adults behaviour. However they are not aware that such punishments might not have a long term result. Moreover, aggressive behaviour in students is fueled as a result of such harsh punishment. A child is also psychologically affected as he is punished in front of his friends leading to the loss of self confidence. For example, a student of class 8 in Madurai took his life as a result of such punishment. Despite this incident strict actions were not taken to prevent such incidents from happening again.
Secondly, Many countries have inculcated the use of positive reinforcement to correct the behaviour of young adult. This had seen promising results across tests conducted in various countries. In addition to which many countries have started to implement appreciation of a child in public before his friends while correcting his behaviour in private for better results. For Instance, in china students are disciplined by making them clean the place they use such as classroom, common area and so on to create a sense of responsibility and cleanliness as they grow.
To sum up, the positive reinforcement alters the behaviour for a student to the extent he does not repeat the mistakes. Indian education board should also take strict actions against corporal punishment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-07 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-03 | longpham2k | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | tony19104 | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-10 | eeshwar | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-17 | jazzlen | 56 | view |
- The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreigh language can cause serious social problems as well as prctical peoblems To what extent do you agree or dis agree with this atatement 11
- Psychologists have known for many years that colour can affect how people feel For this reason attention should be given to colour schemes when decorating places such as offices and hospitals How true is this statement How far does colour influence people 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ers find it as the easiest way to alter an young adults behaviour. However they ar...
^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
...it as the easiest way to alter an young adults behaviour. However they are not aware t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...way to alter an young adults behaviour. However they are not aware that such punishment...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16917293233 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92185568741 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4655625614 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2142857143 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160074344882 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587266951652 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399071699222 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104298716431 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145890974835 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.