The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is ba.n.ned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The ubiquitous presence of mobile phones in contemporary society has greatly enhanced the efficiency of peoples’ daily routines making them a highly sought-after technological tool. Nevertheless, certain employment of mobile phones also engenders negative implications, thereby necessitating their prohibition.
In regard to human communication, technology has played and integral part in our daily lives. First, by using technology devices such as mobile phones and tablets, people, especially elders, are now able to keep in touch with their family members regardless geographic distance. In fact, before the invention such as smart devices, delivering and receiving a message required physical travel, costing unnecessary money, effort and time. Second, the Internet has offered effective and efficient ways to communicate with others. Social networking, for example, have become an Internet platform where users are able to instantly reach international friends and even professional connections, which promotes better social behavior and strengthens social connections.
On the other hand, despite the big afore mentioned benefits, the resultant problem pressure on the society pollution would be far more significant once the benefits of using mobile. First, all people using mobile phones would likely correspond with a tremendous pollution strain on a country. The inconsiderate use of these devices can be particularly nosing such as when loud conservation on mobile phones in public spaces disrupt the tranquility of a peaceful chat with companies, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as the healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, using of mobile phones would tempt many young people including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest in other areas, thereby adding great burdens for government and other people. It, instead, would be a more using technology viable option if the resources focus on supporting academic and working areas.
In conclusion, despite the advantages of long-distance human connection and conveniences. Technology has many some drawbacks. It is, thus, hoped that netizens, especially the young generation, should consider using it sensibly while maintaining their academic and working, avoid being banned from using technology in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86046511628 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03253829891 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645348837209 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2516826911 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.4 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183656013314 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579876889426 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551828805851 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107168322593 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477604871863 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.