The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years.
What are the positive and negative effects of this trend?
Over the past few years, there have been a dramatic increased in the use of mobile phones. With such development, it brings about both negativity and positivity in life and I will discuss both points of view in this essay.
Looking first at the positives, mobile phones across the world has allowed communication to take place easily. With this, people are now able to stay connected even if they are at opposite ends of the world. For example, parents who have children studying abroad can now easily communicate even though they are far away. As a result, it brings about easy communication despite being kilometres apart. Besides communication, mobile phones have also made travelling easier. For instance, for those travelling to a foreign country and are looking for places of interest, they are able to use the map installed in their mobile phones for navigation. Consequently, the easy access of mobile phones do bring about positive effects in life.
On the other hand, increased use of mobile phones does have a harmful effect on society. This is because people are becoming too addicted and glued on to the phone screen 24/7. With regards to this, teenagers who are too engrossed with their mobile phones could not even take their eyes off while crossing the road. Consequently, this causes more traffic accidents to occur due to their negligence while crossing. Additionally, with the increased of mobile phones usage, more people are feeling more lethargic as they spend most of their time on the phone instead of sleeping. This then affects their sleep quality, which is a disastrous effect in their life.
In conclusion, both views have their merits. It is my firm belief that the change in the trend has cause more negative effects as it can cost someone to lose their life easily.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, if, look, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96699669967 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54730752172 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551155115512 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.39665496 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5294117647 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317509223721 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101393891966 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788665219568 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185914070693 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670134698234 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.