Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is no doubt that sports facilities play a crucial role in enhancing the public’s health. However, while some believe that an excellent way to approach this is through having more sports facilities, I would agree with those who argue that this would have minimal impact and other measures are needed such as having a healthy diet.
Firstly, it is important that sports facilities help to equip the public in getting into shape and keeping fit. This is because an area without easy access to a fitness centre is an area that fails to motivate and maintains essential needs for one to keep fit. For example, if we did not have easy access to exercise machines, we would not be able to keep our bodies healthy and fit.
However, I believe that having more areas for exercising would have minimal impact on the public’s health and eating healthily should be considered as exercise alone does not help to keep one fit. One reason for this is that some people might misuse the equipment as they have little or no knowledge regarding its functions. For instance, if they did not use the correct techniques when lifting a kettle bell, they could end up with injuries as they might pull a muscle or two. It would then be beneficial if there were various classes made available for everyone to enrol in, allowing them to learn the basic and safe techniques while using various machines. Besides this, consuming more fruit and vegetables as part of their daily diet is would be essential. As a result of doing these two things, would create a more well-balanced, regular diet and a healthy, active lifestyle.
In conclusion, despite the idea of increasing the number of sports facilities being the best way to improve the general health among the public, it is my firm belief that both engaging in exercise through the correct way of using an equipment and having a balanced diet would be much more beneficial in boosting the public’s health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, then, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84226190476 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55046674122 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53869047619 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.0639723614 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.583333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272491609366 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973179236291 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861079035441 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191738304392 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986408013829 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.