In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development?
In the recent years, it has been a trend that people are able to survive without any face-to-face communication as the Internet availability has enable people to interact with each other via various online platform more easily, made purchases online and even work from home. While there are many benefits to such development, there are also some drawbacks to consider.
Looking first at the advantages of technology advancement, it is undeniable that it has made communication across the world much easier compared to life without Internet. For instance, students who are studying abroad benefited from the Internet as this allows them to easily stay in touch with their family and friends. Besides that, with advancement of Internet, it allows business deals made easily as Internet connects everyone across the world together. As a result, companies do not have to wait for days for a signed deal.
On the other hand, Internet can cause detrimental effects on some people’s lives. This is so as some people has become an addict towards the Internet and could not live without it, thus forgetting about the outside world. With poor social interaction, these people will then feel awkward upon meeting people. In addition, Internet can also cause some people to make poor choices, especially when they are doing online shopping. For example, while choosing the clothes they would like to get, they might not select the right size, as they are unable to try on it. Consequently, they end up with a dress that they could not fit in. It is therefore, much more beneficial for one to make a trip down to the store than purchasing online.
In conclusion, although Internet keeps everyone around the world stay connected, there also drawbacks that can damage one’s lives. Therefore, it is essential to use the Internet moderately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
...cation as the Internet availability has enable people to interact with each other via ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntial to use the Internet moderately.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, if, look, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11221122112 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67424502351 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590759075908 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.113807085 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.266666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26799481577 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777277883212 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075358429728 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154177554742 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685475057977 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.