The use of private cars dominates most large cities in the world, causing a negative effect on the quality of life for the majority of the people who live in these cities.
Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The domination of private cars using in developed urban areas is believed to be responsible for a variety of social issues frustrating the city dwellers dramatically. In order to address the problem, some people suggest using other type of vehicles instead of private cars and also launching worldwide laws to keep the car ownership and use in limitation. While I agree that the use of different vehicles is a good measurement, I don’t think that new laws can help to improve the situation.
For a variety of reasons, using alternative forms of transport will reduce the negative impacts of private cars and bring more benefits if they are used efficiently. Firstly, car is one of the main factors of traffic congestion because of it’s big size, taking more place on the road than others like bicycle or motorcycle. Secondly, it’s usually designed to allow users travel at high speed which other vehicles can’t reach, thereby being more potential to cause traffic accident. Thirdly, going by bicycle or walking is such a good type of physical activities that improve the health and also protect the environment. To demonstrate the advantages of alternative vehicle, for examples, in Japan where electronic train and walking is the most popular means of transport, the inhabitual standart of life is always on the top of the world in comparison with other country.
On the other hand, I believe that introducing international law is out of practice and can’t solve the problem completely. Because each country has it’s own features of economy, society and so on, it’s is quite complicated and difficult to manage the exact value of the amount of car ownership in this one, thereby being a challenge to create common principles which can reach the agreement of all the participants. Even in the case of success in creating a new law, it’s totally not certain that laws will be obeyed completely because national situation can be changing day by day, the law may be suitable now but not in the future. That’s can create argument and confliction among participants.
With all the reasons mentioned below, I believe using other means of transport will cover all the negative side of private car and improve the quality of life of the dwellers but the idea of an international law is unrealistic and impossible to solve the problem efficiently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-14 | Đàm Hải Ly | 73 | view |
- The use of private cars dominates most large cities in the world, causing a negative effect on the quality of life for the majority of the people who live in these cities.Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduce 73
- some people say that physical exercise should be a required part of every school day. Others say that pupils should spend whole school day on academic studies. Which opinion do you agree with? Give reasons to support your choice. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ace on the road than others like bicycle or motorcycle. Secondly, it's usual...
^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffic accident. Thirdly, going by bicycle or walking is such a good type of physic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10969387755 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88860118672 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540816326531 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.3950005583 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.076923077 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1538461538 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263331647208 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919589829216 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731478259806 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163018616322 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042309457287 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.